i’ve been perusing through this month’s Discover mag. i like it. It asks a lot of good questions and does an amply job of supplying lay-answers. There’s some good stuff in there about giving hallucinogens for various psych disorders; OCD being one. i haven’t read the whole thing in depth.
i also read this little blurb about this galaxy that was formed 700 million years after the BigBang whose light is just now reaching us. Does any one else have a problem with this?
i asked a scientist/astonomer friend a short while ago about this apparent paradox of how the hell we got 13 billion light years away from an object before its light arrived. His answer sort of made sense; he tried to tell me that time and distance are proportionally related. The velocity at which the universe is expanding is something of an exponential constant where as the speed of light is fixed.
i’m not sure i get it. i think he was trying to tell me that since the universe was formed, time and distance have been… stretching. Evidently, mathematics proves this out somehow. i guess my question now is whether or not there are two separate time lines operating at the same time. i’m having difficulty getting beyond the ticking clock in the other room. i wonder if the light that left the sun 8 and half minutes ago that’s now helping me see my bowl of grapes can light me up a clue. Eight and half minutes; and if i were to be riding that particular sunbeam i wouldn’t have aged a second? Somebody help me out please.
Posted in GREEN TRIANGLE, KNICKER TWISTERS | Tagged Discover, galaxy, mathematics, paradox, speed of light | 11 Comments »